Comparação de Modelos de IAComparação de Modelos de IA

GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning): A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

Explore os melhores cenáriosDeixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)
Other
Raciocínio
6
Codificação
3
Multimodal
3
Contexto Longo
4
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.000
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
67.486tokens/seg
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)
Other
Raciocínio
1
Codificação
1
Multimodal
1
Contexto Longo
1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.000
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
191.808tokens/seg

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)` vs `Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) debate, GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) scores 60 against Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)'s 10. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)300ms
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)300ms
Tokens per Second
GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning)67.486
Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)191.808
Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.
Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) if...
You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.
You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.
Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.
Choose Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) if...
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.
You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.
Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.
Explore all Best picksUse the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodologyRead the latest analysis posts

Fonte de dados: https://artificialanalysis.ai/

Comparação de GLM-4.7-Flash (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 0.6B (Non-reasoning) | Desempenho, Preços e Benchmarks