GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max (Preview): A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

O Veredicto Final no Confronto GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max (Preview)

Após uma análise abrangente, Qwen3 Max (Preview) surge como a escolha superior para usuários que priorizam inteligência e raciocínio brutos. No entanto, GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) continua a ser uma opção altamente competitiva, especialmente para cenários que exigem tempos de resposta mais rápidos e eficiência de custos. Esta detalhada comparação de GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max (Preview) irá analisar cada métrica crítica para ajudá-lo a tomar a melhor decisão.

Explore os melhores cenários•Deixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)

Other

Raciocínio: 7
Codificação: 3
Multimodal: 2
Contexto Longo: 3
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.001
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: 46.531tokens/seg

Qwen3 Max (Preview)

Other

Raciocínio: 8
Codificação: 3
Multimodal: 2
Contexto Longo: 3
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.002
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: 41.565tokens/seg

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max (Preview) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max (Preview) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)` vs `Qwen3 Max (Preview)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max (Preview) debate, GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) scores 70 against Qwen3 Max (Preview)'s 80. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max (Preview) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max (Preview) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)300ms

Qwen3 Max (Preview)300ms

Tokens per Second

GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)46.531

Qwen3 Max (Preview)41.565

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max (Preview)

Power is only one part of the equation. This GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max (Preview) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) would cost $0.001, whereas Qwen3 Max (Preview) would cost $0.003. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Max (Preview) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy