GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B: A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

O Veredicto Final no Confronto GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B

Após uma análise abrangente, Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B surge como a escolha superior para usuários que priorizam inteligência e raciocínio brutos. No entanto, GPT-3.5 Turbo continua a ser uma opção altamente competitiva, especialmente para cenários que exigem tempos de resposta mais rápidos e eficiência de custos. Esta detalhada comparação de GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B irá analisar cada métrica crítica para ajudá-lo a tomar a melhor decisão.

Explore os melhores cenários•Deixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

GPT-3.5 Turbo

OpenAI

Raciocínio: 6
Codificação: 1
Multimodal: 1
Contexto Longo: 1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.001
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: 100.48tokens/seg

Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B

Other

Raciocínio: 6
Codificação: 6
Multimodal: 1
Contexto Longo: 2
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.015
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `GPT-3.5 Turbo` vs `Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B debate, GPT-3.5 Turbo scores 60 against Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

GPT-3.5 Turbo300ms

Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B300ms

Tokens per Second

GPT-3.5 Turbo100.48

Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B52

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B

Power is only one part of the equation. This GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, GPT-3.5 Turbo would cost $0.001, whereas Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the GPT-3.5 Turbo vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy