Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning): A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

O Veredicto Final no Confronto Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)

Após uma análise abrangente, Grok Code Fast 1 surge como a escolha superior para usuários que priorizam inteligência e raciocínio brutos. No entanto, Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) continua a ser uma opção altamente competitiva, especialmente para cenários que exigem tempos de resposta mais rápidos e eficiência de custos. Esta detalhada comparação de Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) irá analisar cada métrica crítica para ajudá-lo a tomar a melhor decisão.

Explore os melhores cenários•Deixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

Grok Code Fast 1

xAI

Raciocínio: 4
Codificação: 2
Multimodal: 2
Contexto Longo: 4
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.001
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: 307.069tokens/seg

Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)

Other

Raciocínio: 4
Codificação: 1
Multimodal: 1
Contexto Longo: 1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.000
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: 125.696tokens/seg

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Grok Code Fast 1` vs `Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) debate, Grok Code Fast 1 scores 40 against Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)'s 40. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Grok Code Fast 1300ms

Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

Grok Code Fast 1307.069

Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)125.696

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Grok Code Fast 1 would cost $0.001, whereas Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Grok Code Fast 1 if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Grok Code Fast 1 vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Fonte de dados: https://artificialanalysis.ai/