Comparação de Modelos de IAComparação de Modelos de IA

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning): A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

Explore os melhores cenáriosDeixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
Other
Raciocínio
6
Codificação
4
Multimodal
4
Contexto Longo
6
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.001
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
110.448tokens/seg
Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)
Other
Raciocínio
4
Codificação
1
Multimodal
1
Contexto Longo
1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.000
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
126.397tokens/seg

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)` vs `Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) debate, Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) scores 60 against Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)'s 40. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)300ms
Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)300ms
Tokens per Second
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)110.448
Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)126.397
Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.
Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) if...
You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.
Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) decision.
You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.
Choose Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) if...
You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.
Your budget is a primary consideration in the Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) choice.
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.
Explore all Best picksUse the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodologyRead the latest analysis posts

Fonte de dados: https://artificialanalysis.ai/

Comparação de Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) | Desempenho, Preços e Benchmarks