Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B: A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

O Veredicto Final no Confronto Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B

Após uma análise abrangente, Kimi K2 Thinking surge como a escolha superior para usuários que priorizam inteligência e raciocínio brutos. No entanto, Qwen1.5 Chat 110B continua a ser uma opção altamente competitiva, especialmente para cenários que exigem tempos de resposta mais rápidos e eficiência de custos. Esta detalhada comparação de Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B irá analisar cada métrica crítica para ajudá-lo a tomar a melhor decisão.

Explore os melhores cenários•Deixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

Kimi K2 Thinking

Other

Raciocínio: 9
Codificação: 3
Multimodal: 3
Contexto Longo: 5
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.001
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: 96.454tokens/seg

Qwen1.5 Chat 110B

Other

Raciocínio: 6
Codificação: 6
Multimodal: 1
Contexto Longo: 1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.015
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Kimi K2 Thinking` vs `Qwen1.5 Chat 110B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B debate, Kimi K2 Thinking scores 90 against Qwen1.5 Chat 110B's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Kimi K2 Thinking300ms

Qwen1.5 Chat 110B300ms

Tokens per Second

Kimi K2 Thinking96.454

Qwen1.5 Chat 110B70

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B

Power is only one part of the equation. This Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Kimi K2 Thinking would cost $0.001, whereas Qwen1.5 Chat 110B would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B Battle for You?

Choose Kimi K2 Thinking if...

Your top priority is raw performance and capability.

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Qwen1.5 Chat 110B if...

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.

Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Kimi K2 Thinking vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Fonte de dados: https://artificialanalysis.ai/