Comparação de Modelos de IAComparação de Modelos de IA

Magistral Small 1.2 vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning): A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

Explore os melhores cenáriosDeixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

Magistral Small 1.2
Mistral
Raciocínio
8
Codificação
1
Multimodal
2
Contexto Longo
3
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.001
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
97.082tokens/seg
Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)
Other
Raciocínio
2
Codificação
1
Multimodal
1
Contexto Longo
1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.000
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
203.454tokens/seg

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Magistral Small 1.2 vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Magistral Small 1.2` vs `Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) debate, Magistral Small 1.2 scores 80 against Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)'s 20. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Magistral Small 1.2 vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
Magistral Small 1.2300ms
Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)300ms
Tokens per Second
Magistral Small 1.297.082
Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)203.454
Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Magistral Small 1.2 vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Magistral Small 1.2 vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.
Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Magistral Small 1.2 if...
Your top priority is raw performance and capability.
You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.
Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Magistral Small 1.2 vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) decision.
Choose Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) if...
You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.
Your budget is a primary consideration in the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) choice.
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.
Explore all Best picksUse the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Magistral Small 1.2 vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodologyRead the latest analysis posts

Fonte de dados: https://artificialanalysis.ai/

Comparação de Magistral Small 1.2 vs Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) | Desempenho, Preços e Benchmarks