Comparação de Modelos de IAComparação de Modelos de IA

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B: A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

Explore os melhores cenáriosDeixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)
Other
Raciocínio
9
Codificação
2
Multimodal
2
Contexto Longo
3
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.000
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
204.897tokens/seg
Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
Other
Raciocínio
6
Codificação
6
Multimodal
1
Contexto Longo
2
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens
$0.015
Latência P95
1000ms
Tokens por segundo
—

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)` vs `Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B debate, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) scores 90 against Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)300ms
Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B300ms
Tokens per Second
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning)204.897
Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B52
Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B

Power is only one part of the equation. This NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing at a glance.
Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B Battle for You?

Choose NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) if...
Your top priority is raw performance and capability.
You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.
You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.
Choose Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B if...
You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.
You prioritize cost-effectiveness over maximum performance.
Your workload requires consistent, reliable performance.
Explore all Best picksUse the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodologyRead the latest analysis posts

Fonte de dados: https://artificialanalysis.ai/

Comparação de NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (Reasoning) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B | Desempenho, Preços e Benchmarks