Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning): A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

O Veredicto Final no Confronto Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)

Após uma análise abrangente, Qwen1.5 Chat 110B surge como a escolha superior para usuários que priorizam inteligência e raciocínio brutos. No entanto, Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) continua a ser uma opção altamente competitiva, especialmente para cenários que exigem tempos de resposta mais rápidos e eficiência de custos. Esta detalhada comparação de Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) irá analisar cada métrica crítica para ajudá-lo a tomar a melhor decisão.

Explore os melhores cenários•Deixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

Qwen1.5 Chat 110B

Other

Raciocínio: 6
Codificação: 6
Multimodal: 1
Contexto Longo: 1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.015
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: —

Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)

Other

Raciocínio: 6
Codificação: 1
Multimodal: 1
Contexto Longo: 2
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.001
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: 58.101tokens/seg

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Qwen1.5 Chat 110B` vs `Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) debate, Qwen1.5 Chat 110B scores 60 against Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)'s 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Qwen1.5 Chat 110B300ms

Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

Qwen1.5 Chat 110B70

Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)58.101

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Qwen1.5 Chat 110B would cost $0.018, whereas Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) Battle for You?

Choose Qwen1.5 Chat 110B if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Qwen1.5 Chat 110B vs Qwen3 14B (Reasoning) Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Fonte de dados: https://artificialanalysis.ai/