Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini: A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

O Veredicto Final no Confronto Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini

Após uma análise abrangente, Jamba 1.5 Mini surge como a escolha superior para usuários que priorizam inteligência e raciocínio brutos. No entanto, Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) continua a ser uma opção altamente competitiva, especialmente para cenários que exigem tempos de resposta mais rápidos e eficiência de custos. Esta detalhada comparação de Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini irá analisar cada métrica crítica para ajudá-lo a tomar a melhor decisão.

Explore os melhores cenários•Deixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)

Other

Raciocínio: 2
Codificação: 1
Multimodal: 1
Contexto Longo: 1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.000
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: 203.465tokens/seg

Jamba 1.5 Mini

Other

Raciocínio: 6
Codificação: 6
Multimodal: 1
Contexto Longo: 1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.000
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)` vs `Jamba 1.5 Mini`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini debate, Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) scores 20 against Jamba 1.5 Mini's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)300ms

Jamba 1.5 Mini300ms

Tokens per Second

Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning)203.465

Jamba 1.5 Mini46

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini

Power is only one part of the equation. This Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) would cost $0.000, whereas Jamba 1.5 Mini would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini Battle for You?

Choose Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) if...

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Your use case demands cutting-edge AI performance.

Choose Jamba 1.5 Mini if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Qwen3 0.6B (Reasoning) vs Jamba 1.5 Mini Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Fonte de dados: https://artificialanalysis.ai/