Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Claude 2.0: A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

O Veredicto Final no Confronto Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Claude 2.0

Após uma análise abrangente, Claude 2.0 surge como a escolha superior para usuários que priorizam inteligência e raciocínio brutos. No entanto, Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) continua a ser uma opção altamente competitiva, especialmente para cenários que exigem tempos de resposta mais rápidos e eficiência de custos. Esta detalhada comparação de Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Claude 2.0 irá analisar cada métrica crítica para ajudá-lo a tomar a melhor decisão.

Explore os melhores cenários•Deixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)

Other

Raciocínio: 4
Codificação: 1
Multimodal: 1
Contexto Longo: 1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.000
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: 124.978tokens/seg

Claude 2.0

Anthropic

Raciocínio: 6
Codificação: 1
Multimodal: 1
Contexto Longo: 1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.015
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Claude 2.0 matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Claude 2.0 analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)` vs `Claude 2.0`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Claude 2.0 debate, Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) scores 40 against Claude 2.0's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Claude 2.0 comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Claude 2.0 decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)300ms

Claude 2.0300ms

Tokens per Second

Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)124.978

Claude 2.068

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Claude 2.0

Power is only one part of the equation. This Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Claude 2.0 pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) would cost $0.000, whereas Claude 2.0 would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Claude 2.0 choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy