Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B: A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

O Veredicto Final no Confronto Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B

Após uma análise abrangente, Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) surge como a escolha superior para usuários que priorizam inteligência e raciocínio brutos. No entanto, Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B continua a ser uma opção altamente competitiva, especialmente para cenários que exigem tempos de resposta mais rápidos e eficiência de custos. Esta detalhada comparação de Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B irá analisar cada métrica crítica para ajudá-lo a tomar a melhor decisão.

Explore os melhores cenários•Deixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)

Other

Raciocínio: 4
Codificação: 1
Multimodal: 1
Contexto Longo: 1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.000
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: 125.578tokens/seg

Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)` vs `Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B debate, Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) scores 40 against Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B's 10. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)300ms

Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B300ms

Tokens per Second

Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning)125.578

Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B169.293

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B

Power is only one part of the equation. This Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) would cost $0.000, whereas Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B would cost $0.000. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy

Which Model Wins the Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B Battle for You?

Choose Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) if...

You are working in a technical or scientific field requiring the highest accuracy.

Cost is a secondary concern to power in your Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B decision.

You need the most advanced reasoning capabilities available.

Choose Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B if...

You need a highly responsive model for user-facing applications.

Your budget is a primary consideration in the Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B choice.

You are developing at scale where operational costs are critical.

Explore all Best picks Use the AI Selector for a tailored recommendation

Your Questions about the Qwen3 1.7B (Reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 8B Comparison

Review the full evaluation methodology · Read the latest analysis posts

Fonte de dados: https://artificialanalysis.ai/