Qwen3-Coder-Next vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning): A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

O Veredicto Final no Confronto Qwen3-Coder-Next vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)

Após uma análise abrangente, GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) surge como a escolha superior para usuários que priorizam inteligência e raciocínio brutos. No entanto, Qwen3-Coder-Next continua a ser uma opção altamente competitiva, especialmente para cenários que exigem tempos de resposta mais rápidos e eficiência de custos. Esta detalhada comparação de Qwen3-Coder-Next vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) irá analisar cada métrica crítica para ajudá-lo a tomar a melhor decisão.

Explore os melhores cenários•Deixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

Qwen3-Coder-Next

Other

Raciocínio: 6
Codificação: 2
Multimodal: 2
Contexto Longo: 4
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.000
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: 56.308tokens/seg

GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)

Other

Raciocínio: 7
Codificação: 3
Multimodal: 2
Contexto Longo: 3
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.001
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: 46.407tokens/seg

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the Qwen3-Coder-Next vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our Qwen3-Coder-Next vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Qwen3-Coder-Next` vs `GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the Qwen3-Coder-Next vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) debate, Qwen3-Coder-Next scores 60 against GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)'s 70. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious Qwen3-Coder-Next vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the Qwen3-Coder-Next vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

Qwen3-Coder-Next300ms

GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)300ms

Tokens per Second

Qwen3-Coder-Next56.308

GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)46.407

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of Qwen3-Coder-Next vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning)

Power is only one part of the equation. This Qwen3-Coder-Next vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, Qwen3-Coder-Next would cost $0.001, whereas GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) would cost $0.001. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the Qwen3-Coder-Next vs GLM-4.5 (Reasoning) choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy