R1 1776 vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B: A Comparação Definitiva de Desempenho e Preço

Mergulhe profundamente em raciocínio, benchmarks e insights de latência.

O Veredicto Final no Confronto R1 1776 vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B

Após uma análise abrangente, Qwen1.5 Chat 110B surge como a escolha superior para usuários que priorizam inteligência e raciocínio brutos. No entanto, R1 1776 continua a ser uma opção altamente competitiva, especialmente para cenários que exigem tempos de resposta mais rápidos e eficiência de custos. Esta detalhada comparação de R1 1776 vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B irá analisar cada métrica crítica para ajudá-lo a tomar a melhor decisão.

Explore os melhores cenários•Deixe o AI Selector recomendar os próximos passos

Instantâneo do Modelo

Principais métricas de decisão em um relance.

R1 1776

Other

Raciocínio: 6
Codificação: 6
Multimodal: 1
Contexto Longo: 2
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.015
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: —

Qwen1.5 Chat 110B

Other

Raciocínio: 6
Codificação: 6
Multimodal: 1
Contexto Longo: 1
Preço Combinado / 1M tokens: $0.015
Latência P95: 1000ms
Tokens por segundo: —

Overall Capabilities

The capability radar provides a holistic view of the R1 1776 vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B matchup. This chart illustrates each model's strengths and weaknesses at a glance, forming a cornerstone of our R1 1776 vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B analysis.

This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `R1 1776` vs `Qwen1.5 Chat 110B`.

Benchmark Breakdown

For a granular look, this chart directly compares scores across standardized benchmarks. In the critical MMLU Pro test, a key part of the R1 1776 vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B debate, R1 1776 scores 60 against Qwen1.5 Chat 110B's 60. This data-driven approach is essential for any serious R1 1776 vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B comparison.

This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.

Speed & Latency

Speed is a crucial factor in the R1 1776 vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B decision for interactive applications. The metrics below highlight the trade-offs you should weigh before shipping to production.

Time to First Token

R1 1776300ms

Qwen1.5 Chat 110B300ms

Tokens per Second

R1 177631

Qwen1.5 Chat 110B70

Head to the playground to validate these results yourself

The Economics of R1 1776 vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B

Power is only one part of the equation. This R1 1776 vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B pricing analysis gives you a true sense of value.

Pricing Breakdown

Compare input and output pricing at a glance.

Real-World Cost Scenario

To process 1M input tokens and generate 250k output tokens, R1 1776 would cost $0.018, whereas Qwen1.5 Chat 110B would cost $0.018. This practical calculation is vital for any developer considering the R1 1776 vs Qwen1.5 Chat 110B choice.

Review the complete pricing and packaging strategy