Time to First Token · Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)
—
Time to First Token · GPT-5 mini (high)
—
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) vs GPT-5 mini (high): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison
Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.
The Final Verdict in the Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) vs GPT-5 mini (high) Showdown
The current catalog does not contain complete performance evidence for both models, so this page does not declare an overall winner. Use the available fields as comparison signals and validate the models on your own workload.
Model Snapshot
Key decision metrics at a glance.
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)GPT-5 mini (high)
6.0
Reasoning9.0
7.0
Coding2.0
4.0
Multimodal2.0
6.0
Long Context3.0
$10
Blended Price / 1M tokens$0.688
—
P95 Latency—
55.017
Tokens per second—
Machine-readable comparison data
| Model | Metric | Value | Unit | Source / snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) | Reasoning | 6.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| GPT-5 mini (high) | Reasoning | 9.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) | Coding | 7.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| GPT-5 mini (high) | Coding | 2.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) | Multimodal | 4.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| GPT-5 mini (high) | Multimodal | 2.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) | Long Context | 6.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| GPT-5 mini (high) | Long Context | 3.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) | Blended Price / 1M tokens | $10 | USD per 1M tokens | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| GPT-5 mini (high) | Blended Price / 1M tokens | $0.688 | USD per 1M tokens | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) | P95 Latency | — | milliseconds | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| GPT-5 mini (high) | P95 Latency | — | milliseconds | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) | Tokens per second | 55.017 | tokens per second | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| GPT-5 mini (high) | Tokens per second | — | tokens per second | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
Data provided by Artificial Analysis; live values use the current catalog.
Overall Capabilities
This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)` vs `GPT-5 mini (high)`.
Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)GPT-5 mini (high)
Benchmark Breakdown
This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.
66.915.6
ARTIFICIAL ANALYSIS CODING50.625.3
ARTIFICIAL ANALYSIS INTELLIGENCE—90.7
ARTIFICIAL ANALYSIS MATHClaude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)GPT-5 mini (high)
Speed & Latency
Lower time to first token is better; higher tokens per second is better.
Tokens per Second · Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)
55.017
Tokens per Second · GPT-5 mini (high)
—
The Economics of Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) vs GPT-5 mini (high)
Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing in USD per 1M tokens.
$5$0.25
Input Pricing$25$2
Output PricingClaude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)GPT-5 mini (high)
Real-World Cost Scenario
Per run: 1M input tokens + 250k output tokensClaude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)$11.25
GPT-5 mini (high)$0.75
GPT-5 mini (high) costs $10.5 less per run
Your Questions about the Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) vs GPT-5 mini (high) Comparison
Is `Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort)` a direct replacement for `GPT-5 mini (high)`?
The current Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) vs GPT-5 mini (high) data does not establish a universal replacement. Compare the available metrics, then validate quality, latency, reliability, and cost on your own workload.
For coding, which is better in the `Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) vs GPT-5 mini (high)` debate?
The benchmark data in our Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) vs GPT-5 mini (high) comparison shows Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) has a clear advantage, scoring 66.9 on LiveCodeBench versus 15.6.
How was this `Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) vs GPT-5 mini (high)` comparison conducted?
Our Claude Opus 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort) vs GPT-5 mini (high) comparison uses published benchmark, pricing, speed, and latency fields provided by Artificial Analysis. Missing values remain unavailable, and the result should be checked against your workload.