Time to First Token · Hy3
—
Time to First Token · o3
—
Hy3 vs o3: The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison
Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.
The Final Verdict in the Hy3 vs o3 Showdown
The current catalog does not contain complete performance evidence for both models, so this page does not declare an overall winner. Use the available fields as comparison signals and validate the models on your own workload.
Model Snapshot
Key decision metrics at a glance.
Hy3o3
6.0
Reasoning9.0
6.0
Coding6.0
3.0
Multimodal3.0
5.0
Long Context4.0
$0.241
Blended Price / 1M tokens$3.5
—
P95 Latency—
71.711
Tokens per second128.056
Machine-readable comparison data
| Model | Metric | Value | Unit | Source / snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hy3 | Reasoning | 6.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| o3 | Reasoning | 9.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Hy3 | Coding | 6.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| o3 | Coding | 6.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Hy3 | Multimodal | 3.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| o3 | Multimodal | 3.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Hy3 | Long Context | 5.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| o3 | Long Context | 4.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Hy3 | Blended Price / 1M tokens | $0.241 | USD per 1M tokens | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| o3 | Blended Price / 1M tokens | $3.5 | USD per 1M tokens | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Hy3 | P95 Latency | — | milliseconds | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| o3 | P95 Latency | — | milliseconds | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Hy3 | Tokens per second | 71.711 | tokens per second | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| o3 | Tokens per second | 128.056 | tokens per second | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
Data provided by Artificial Analysis; live values use the current catalog.
Overall Capabilities
This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Hy3` vs `o3`.
Hy3o3
Benchmark Breakdown
This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.
58.8—
ARTIFICIAL ANALYSIS CODING41.230.4
ARTIFICIAL ANALYSIS INTELLIGENCE—88.3
ARTIFICIAL ANALYSIS MATHHy3o3
Speed & Latency
Lower time to first token is better; higher tokens per second is better.
Tokens per Second · Hy3
71.711
Tokens per Second · o3
128.056
The Economics of Hy3 vs o3
Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing in USD per 1M tokens.
$0.136$2
Input Pricing$0.557$8
Output PricingHy3o3
Real-World Cost Scenario
Per run: 1M input tokens + 250k output tokensHy3$0.275
o3$4
Hy3 costs $3.725 less per run
Your Questions about the Hy3 vs o3 Comparison
Is `Hy3` a direct replacement for `o3`?
The current Hy3 vs o3 data does not establish a universal replacement. Compare the available metrics, then validate quality, latency, reliability, and cost on your own workload.
For coding, which is better in the `Hy3 vs o3` debate?
The current catalog does not contain comparable coding benchmark values for both models, so this page does not declare a coding winner.
How was this `Hy3 vs o3` comparison conducted?
Our Hy3 vs o3 comparison uses published benchmark, pricing, speed, and latency fields provided by Artificial Analysis. Missing values remain unavailable, and the result should be checked against your workload.