Time to First Token · Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)
—
Time to First Token · GPT-5 (high)
—
Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GPT-5 (high): The Ultimate Performance & Pricing Comparison
Deep dive into reasoning, benchmarks, and latency insights.
The Final Verdict in the Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GPT-5 (high) Showdown
The current catalog does not contain complete performance evidence for both models, so this page does not declare an overall winner. Use the available fields as comparison signals and validate the models on your own workload.
Model Snapshot
Key decision metrics at a glance.
Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)GPT-5 (high)
6.0
Reasoning9.0
8.0
Coding4.0
5.0
Multimodal3.0
7.0
Long Context4.0
$20
Blended Price / 1M tokens$3.438
—
P95 Latency—
70.509
Tokens per second—
Machine-readable comparison data
| Model | Metric | Value | Unit | Source / snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) | Reasoning | 6.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| GPT-5 (high) | Reasoning | 9.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) | Coding | 8.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| GPT-5 (high) | Coding | 4.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) | Multimodal | 5.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| GPT-5 (high) | Multimodal | 3.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) | Long Context | 7.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| GPT-5 (high) | Long Context | 4.0 | benchmark or capability score | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) | Blended Price / 1M tokens | $20 | USD per 1M tokens | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| GPT-5 (high) | Blended Price / 1M tokens | $3.438 | USD per 1M tokens | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) | P95 Latency | — | milliseconds | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| GPT-5 (high) | P95 Latency | — | milliseconds | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) | Tokens per second | 70.509 | tokens per second | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
| GPT-5 (high) | Tokens per second | — | tokens per second | Artificial Analysis · current catalog |
Data provided by Artificial Analysis; live values use the current catalog.
Overall Capabilities
This radar chart visually maps the core capabilities (reasoning, coding, math proxy, multimodal, long context) of `Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)` vs `GPT-5 (high)`.
Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)GPT-5 (high)
Benchmark Breakdown
This grouped bar chart provides a side-by-side comparison for each benchmark metric.
76.537.8
ARTIFICIAL ANALYSIS CODING59.934.7
ARTIFICIAL ANALYSIS INTELLIGENCE—94.3
ARTIFICIAL ANALYSIS MATHClaude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)GPT-5 (high)
Speed & Latency
Lower time to first token is better; higher tokens per second is better.
Tokens per Second · Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)
70.509
Tokens per Second · GPT-5 (high)
—
The Economics of Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GPT-5 (high)
Pricing Breakdown
Compare input and output pricing in USD per 1M tokens.
$10$1.25
Input Pricing$50$10
Output PricingClaude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)GPT-5 (high)
Real-World Cost Scenario
Per run: 1M input tokens + 250k output tokensClaude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)$22.5
GPT-5 (high)$3.75
GPT-5 (high) costs $18.75 less per run
Your Questions about the Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GPT-5 (high) Comparison
Is `Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback)` a direct replacement for `GPT-5 (high)`?
The current Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GPT-5 (high) data does not establish a universal replacement. Compare the available metrics, then validate quality, latency, reliability, and cost on your own workload.
For coding, which is better in the `Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GPT-5 (high)` debate?
The benchmark data in our Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GPT-5 (high) comparison shows Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) has a clear advantage, scoring 76.5 on LiveCodeBench versus 37.8.
How was this `Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GPT-5 (high)` comparison conducted?
Our Claude Fable 5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Opus 4.8 Fallback) vs GPT-5 (high) comparison uses published benchmark, pricing, speed, and latency fields provided by Artificial Analysis. Missing values remain unavailable, and the result should be checked against your workload.